<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>U.S. Legal Blog &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.uslegal.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.uslegal.com</link>
	<description>Just another USLegal Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:24:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How chewy is too chewy? What is too litigious?</title>
		<link>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/06/how-chewy-is-too-chewy-what-is-too-litigious/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/06/how-chewy-is-too-chewy-what-is-too-litigious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/06/27/how-chewy-is-too-chewy-what-is-too-litigious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman is suing for $25,000, claiming a Starburst Fruit Chew candy pulled her jaw out of joint. This news comes on the heels of the $65 million lawsuit against a dry cleaner for a suit and the $2,000 lawsuit for a pair of torn pants. Do you think the name &#8220;Fruit Chew&#8221; is insufficient [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman is suing for $25,000, claiming a Starburst Fruit Chew candy pulled her jaw out of joint. This news comes on the heels of the $65 million lawsuit against a dry cleaner for a suit and the $2,000 lawsuit for a pair of torn pants. Do you think the name &#8220;Fruit Chew&#8221; is insufficient and a warning label on the harmful risks of the candy&#8217;s chewiness is needed? What about other warnings, like blowing bubbles with bubble gum can cause gum to be cut out of hair?</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,286855,00.html">http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,286855,00.html </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/06/how-chewy-is-too-chewy-what-is-too-litigious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are CEOs Overpaid?</title>
		<link>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/05/are-ceos-overpaid/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/05/are-ceos-overpaid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 21:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dana Altman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/05/01/are-ceos-overpaid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, it was reported that eBay&#8217;s President and Chief Executive Officer Meg Whitman received over $11 million in compensation last year. In contrast, departing Delta Airlines Cheif Executive Officer Gerald Grinstein refused roughly $10 million in bonuses, citing the overinflated nature of corporate pay packages. What would you do in either person&#8217;s shoes?
See the articles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, it was reported that eBay&#8217;s President and Chief Executive Officer Meg Whitman received over $11 million in compensation last year. In contrast, departing Delta Airlines Cheif Executive Officer Gerald Grinstein refused roughly $10 million in bonuses, citing the overinflated nature of corporate pay packages. What would you do in either person&#8217;s shoes?</p>
<p>See the articles at:<br />
<a href="http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070321/BIZ/703210344/1005">http://news.findlaw.com/ap/f/66/05-01-2007/d848001fc77bae8e.html<br />
http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070321/BIZ/703210344/1005 </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/05/are-ceos-overpaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Futile Care Law</title>
		<link>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/04/texas-futile-care-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/04/texas-futile-care-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Della Sellers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/04/10/texas-futile-care-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 10, 2007, a judge in Austin, Texas granted a family&#8217;s request to continue life support of their 17-month old child who is suffering from a progressive illness that does not allow him to breathe on his own. The hospital had ordered that he be taken off life-support pursuant to a Texas futile care law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 10, 2007, a judge in Austin, Texas granted a family&#8217;s request to continue life support of their 17-month old child who is suffering from a progressive illness that does not allow him to breathe on his own. The hospital had ordered that he be taken off life-support pursuant to a Texas futile care law that allows hospitals to end life-sustaining treatment in similar situations as long as they provide ten days&#8217; notice to the family. Do you believe the family should have the right to make the decision of when to end medical treatment? Do you think the futile care law should be overturned? Do you believe hospitals should be allowed to end treatment when their efforts are deemed futile and without medical benefit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uslegal.com/2007/04/texas-futile-care-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New USLegal Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.uslegal.com/2006/11/test/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uslegal.com/2006/11/test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uslegal.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USLegal Blog is now open to provide attorneys and the public a place to discuss legal matters of interest to users. We hope you enjoy the site.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USLegal Blog is now open to provide attorneys and the public a place to discuss legal matters of interest to users. We hope you enjoy the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uslegal.com/2006/11/test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
